Client money is sacrosanct

This has long been a guiding principle. Solicitors are guardians and trustees of client money and are expected to exercise proper stewardship over it. Everything that we do with client money has to in accordance with the SRA Accounts Rules and “ethical”.

This case is another reminder of how the SDT views serial breaches, and how what was called a “tidying up exercise” brought a career to an end.

There really is no such thing as a tidying up process by which a solicitor can take residual balances from client account. I have seen this expression used many times and its invariably misplaced. The simple position is that there is either a proper entitlement to transfer the money to office account, or there is not.

I have come across this scenario many times, more so since solicitors must actually check what balances they hold and why. A busy practice may well have many such balances after transactions have been concluded and they need dealing with properly.

In a Judgment dated 7 August 2017 the Tribunal reiterated the importance of properly identifying an entitlement to money before transferring it from client to office account in respect of fees. This was a case in which a solicitor, Mr Burke, identified a number of relatively modest residual balances on client ledgers. They added up. He drew bills matching each of those balances and then transferred the money across to office account. There was no evidence according to the judgment that clients had been notified or had been sent any of the bills. Further, there was no evidence that Mr Burke had taken any steps to check work had been done to justify fees, or to identify who may be properly entitled to the money. These cumulative failings, combined with the number of transfers were sufficient to enable the tribunal to conclude he had behaved deliberately and thereby dishonestly.

Whilst recognising that Mr Burke had learned a severe lesson from the process and was unlikely to repeat his behaviour, the Tribunal concluded that there was damage to the solicitors’ profession and that a message needed to be sent to remind the profession this was not acceptable. This very substantially contributed towards the decision to strike him from the Roll.

If in any doubt at all about what you can and cannot do with money in client account, take informed advice.

Comments

No comments so far - why not be the first?

@
http://
(HTML markup not supported)
The Leigh Day appeal reaffirmed some basic principles for appeals of SRA judgements
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal regularly deals with applications brought by the SRA following the conclusion of criminal proceedings against solicitors. The conviction sometimes forms the entire basis of the proceedings, but otherwise
In late 2013 Aidan Loy committed three drink driving offences for which he was sentenced in December 2013 and February 2014. The second two offences were dealt with together, and as they were all committed in a very short period of time with
The recently published judgment in Forz Khan v Bar Standards Board provides insight into the professional consequences of careless talk and use of LinkedIn. It comes hot on the heels of an SDT judgment in Deborah Daniels who was prosecuted by
LawCare released striking statistics at the beginning of 2018 which show the number of lawyers calling for help is increasing. Lawyers' mental and emotional health has been slowly creeping up the agenda and even the SRA is recognising
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal is now consulting on whether to reduce the standard of proof in disciplinary cases from a criminal to a civil one.
Solicitors have been warned to watch their language and it is highly likely that other regulators will adopt a similar approach.
Solicitors and firms are required to report to the SRA promptly, serious misconduct but what constitutes serious misconduct
The SRA and other regulators frequently bring disciplinary proceedings based on "a lack of integrity." But what is integrity?
In September 2017 Majid Mahmood was fined £25,000 and was the subject of a deferred period of suspension as a result of wholly inappropriate posts on his Facebook Page
On the 21 September 2017 the SRA published a warning notice to solicitors, firms and anyone else it regulates who provide tax planning services
There is a procedure in the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal which allows the parties to apply for disciplinary proceedings to be concluded by a Statement of Agreed Facts and Outcome.
Michael Cremin was a man who presented himself to the outside world as a Lawyer and Advocate. He had a professional profile on the web site of Cotswold Barristers Chambers, along with his photograph. Cremin was neither.
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal has confirmed that it will consult on where to set the standard of proof when determining allegations of misconduct against solicitors. The Bar Standards Board is also looking at a new civil standard of
In proceedings before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal it has for very many years been a requirement that a solicitor should clearly know the case that he or she has to meet. In other words, there is an obligation on the SRA to properly
The need to deal carefully, thoroughly and openly with the SRA during investigations cannot be overstated. There is an explicit professional obligation to cooperate with the Authority and to provide it with whatever information it might need
Web site powered by CommsBox™