Dealing with SRA investigations

Open and honest

The need to deal carefully, thoroughly and openly with the SRA during investigations cannot be overstated. There is an explicit professional obligation to cooperate with the Authority and to provide it with whatever information it might need to carry out regulation responsibilities. No one will argue with that but there is also a balance to be struck.
Investigations can be conducted in a variety of ways.

The Authority can conduct an enquiry in writing. This is a desk based investigation conducted by an investigation officer or caseworker. Their experience and seniority vary considerably. The letter will typically explain the reason for the investigation and set out a series of questions and a timetable for answering.

The written responses need preparing with considerable care. Careless or imprecise answers can come back to haunt you at a later stage should the investigation lead to disciplinary proceedings. You will be surprised at just how thoroughly your answers are looked at, and it may be difficult or impossible to correct a mistake or explain what you really meant by inaccurate answers.

If there is one stage where it is worth taking proper legal advice before doing anything, this is it because it can have a huge impact on everything that follows. It can bring an investigation to an end; it can limit damage and begin to form the basis of an agreement that avoids a Disciplinary Tribunal; it can lay the foundations for evidence at a Tribunal should that be necessary.

The Authority can also conduct an investigation in person by sending an investigation officer to your office to conduct an enquiry. That will usually be preceded by a letter from the nominated officer giving notice of an attendance, and specifying the documents or files that he or she wants to see. It is very likely the officer will want to interview you, and as with questions in writing it needs dealing with considerable care. The interviews are invariably recorded with selected extracts being used at a later stage depending upon the outcome of the investigation.

Alternatively, the officer may prefer to ask questions in writing and obtain your answers that way. There is no prescribed format, there is no legal requirement for a caution and many solicitors are unaware of how best to deal with investigation officers at this stage.

Whatever form the investigation takes, it needs treating seriously so that you comply with your obligations to your regulator. Equally, the SRA must be sufficiently open about its investigation so that you can positively contribute. This is not like a police investigation where you can opt not to answer questions, but you are entitled to legal advice in advance of and during investigations so that your answers are specific to the questions that are put to you, and ones that will stand later scrutiny should the matter proceed to a tribunal.

You will need for example to write with great care when explaining what you did and why, and what your state of mind was. This can be absolutely critical.

I have dealt with dozens of cases where solicitors have fallen down on the inadequacy of their answers either at interview or in correspondence and where damage is unwittingly caused at an early stage in the process where the need for legal advice may not be immediately obvious.

Comments

No comments so far - why not be the first?

@
http://
(HTML markup not supported)
The article below was printed in the Law Society Gazette and prompted quite a discussion! In September 2018 I described how the SRA were dealing with solicitors convicted of drink driving, and the need for a more discerning and informed
A much simpler set of Accounts Rules will come into force in November 2019, and will for the first time give firms, managers and sole practitioners considerable flexibility on how they go about complying and dealing with client money.
The Leigh Day appeal reaffirmed some basic principles for appeals of SRA judgements
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal regularly deals with applications brought by the SRA following the conclusion of criminal proceedings against solicitors. The conviction sometimes forms the entire basis of the proceedings, but otherwise
In late 2013 Aidan Loy committed three drink driving offences for which he was sentenced in December 2013 and February 2014. The second two offences were dealt with together, and as they were all committed in a very short period of time with
The recently published judgment in Forz Khan v Bar Standards Board provides insight into the professional consequences of careless talk and use of LinkedIn. It comes hot on the heels of an SDT judgment in Deborah Daniels who was prosecuted by
LawCare released striking statistics at the beginning of 2018 which show the number of lawyers calling for help is increasing. Lawyers' mental and emotional health has been slowly creeping up the agenda and even the SRA is recognising
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal is now consulting on whether to reduce the standard of proof in disciplinary cases from a criminal to a civil one.
Solicitors have been warned to watch their language and it is highly likely that other regulators will adopt a similar approach.
Solicitors and firms are required to report to the SRA promptly, serious misconduct but what constitutes serious misconduct
The SRA and other regulators frequently bring disciplinary proceedings based on "a lack of integrity." But what is integrity?
In September 2017 Majid Mahmood was fined £25,000 and was the subject of a deferred period of suspension as a result of wholly inappropriate posts on his Facebook Page
On the 21 September 2017 the SRA published a warning notice to solicitors, firms and anyone else it regulates who provide tax planning services
There is a procedure in the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal which allows the parties to apply for disciplinary proceedings to be concluded by a Statement of Agreed Facts and Outcome.
Michael Cremin was a man who presented himself to the outside world as a Lawyer and Advocate. He had a professional profile on the web site of Cotswold Barristers Chambers, along with his photograph. Cremin was neither.
This has long been a guiding principle. Solicitors are guardians and trustees of client money and are expected to exercise proper stewardship over it. Everything that we do with client money has to in accordance with the SRA Accounts Rules
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal has confirmed that it will consult on where to set the standard of proof when determining allegations of misconduct against solicitors. The Bar Standards Board is also looking at a new civil standard of
In proceedings before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal it has for very many years been a requirement that a solicitor should clearly know the case that he or she has to meet. In other words, there is an obligation on the SRA to properly
Web site powered by CommsBox™